MedBlog

Cancer

Personalized treatment is key for Stage 0 breast cancer

Cancer

A mammogram image displaying dense breast tissue with potential abnormalities.
In many cases, the extent of DCIS within the breast can be estimated from imaging studies.

An early form of breast cancer called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has stirred controversy in the medical community nationwide.

DCIS, also known as Stage 0 breast cancer, is abnormal cells that are confined to the milk ducts of the breast. The debate is whether all cases of DCIS should be treated immediately with surgery and additional therapy, or if patients should be monitored instead and treated only if the cancer spreads.

A New York Times article from August 2015 has fanned the flames of this controversy. The article features DCIS patients reacting with a mix of gratitude and outrage about their cancer treatment. Some felt their treatment was unnecessary or too severe; others were glad they received proactive care.

Both sides of the debate have a viable argument: of course we don’t want to perform surgeries that aren’t needed or expose women to radiation or hormonal therapy unnecessarily, and DCIS in some women will never spread beyond the milk ducts.

But this is our concern: DCIS has a significant chance of turning into invasive cancer. There is currently no way to know which cases will become invasive. Until we have a way to determine that, we can’t just sit back and watch women develop breast cancer. We favor a personalized, case-by-case approach to treating Stage 0 breast cancer over watching and waiting.

I’ve asked four of our breast cancer experts to explain our position and clear up some misconceptions about the treatment of DCIS.

Our final thoughts about the treatment of DCIS

We’re certain that treatment should not be the same for all patients, and that we should carefully consider each individual case before treating DCIS. One of our big concerns is that invasive cancer may potentially require additional therapies such as chemotherapy, which could have been avoided for some women if they had been treated when they were diagnosed with DCIS only. We must look at the patient characteristics and the tumor characteristics carefully to determine the best therapeutic approach.

It will be beneficial to patients and providers when, through continual research, we can clearly characterize genes in those cancers that never progress versus the genes of those that become aggressive. DCIS is a complex condition, and one thing is certain: DCIS is a type of breast cancer that needs to be evaluated in greater depth before we can say it’s acceptable to watch and wait. 

Have you or a loved one gone through DCIS treatment? Which side of the debate are you on? Share your opinion with us on Facebook or Twitter.

Contributing physicians

Dr. Roshni Rao has been with UT Southwestern since 2005. She is a surgical oncologist who focuses on the surgical treatment of breast cancer.

Dr. Phil Evans is a radiation oncologist. He is the Director of the UT Southwestern Center for Breast Care, and he joined the UT faculty in March 2002.

Dr. Barbara Haley is a medical oncologist who focuses on emerging alternatives for treating breast cancer, including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and biologic therapy.

Dr. Agnieszka Witkiewicz is an Associate Professor of Pathology. Her work involves the evaluation of breast tissue for diagnosis and treatment plans.

Dr. James Willson has served as Director of the Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center at UT Southwestern Medical Center since 2004. Under his leadership, the center was recently named an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center.