Clinical Heart and Vascular Center
Randomized Controlled Trial of ECG Screening in Young Athletes: Necessary, Yes – Feasible, Maybe
The sudden death of a young athlete is a tragedy that affects families and communities across the country. Identifying who is at risk for sudden cardiac death is challenging, and the role of ECG in screening these athletes is hotly debated. Current AHA/ACC guidelines do not recommend routine ECG screening in young athletes, in contrast to some international guidelines. Despite this lack of scientific support, in 2013, 2015, and 2017 the Texas Legislature considered bills that would require high school students to undergo mandated ECG screening prior to participating in high school athletics.
Advocates of the ECG screening argue that it can help identify young athletes with high-risk conditions such as electrical or structural heart diseases that might not be detected in routine history and physical exams, the current standard of care. Opponents cite the low prevalence of these conditions, the challenges in accurate interpretation of the ECG, and the high risk of false positives requiring additional, possibly invasive testing, with consequent expense and potential life-threatening risk. Indeed, the only reason to add ECG to standard screening of athletes is if it can be demonstrated that including it actually saves lives; the exclusive way to test this objective is with a randomized, controlled trial.
This year’s AHA held a session titled “Rhythm is Relevant: Screening Tools for Arrhythmias.” As part of this session, we presented data from our recent pilot study to assess the feasibility of a randomized, controlled trial investigating ECG screening in Texas high school athletes. Our experience identified several challenges with ECG screening in this population, including low participation in “opt-in” enrollment, accurate diagnosis of abnormal ECGs using specialized software, and, most challengingly, difficulties in study follow-up for nonfatal cardiac events.
The role of screening ECGs in young athletes remains controversial. We believe that more data are required before further recommendations can be made, keeping in mind the dictum: ‘above all, do no harm.
The role of screening ECGs in young athletes remains controversial. We believe that more data are required before further recommendations can be made, keeping in mind the dictum: “above all, do no harm.” Our experience highlights a number of challenges that need to be addressed to upscale our pilot study to the entire state, though we are working with our partners, including Children’s Medical Center, the Texas ACC, the AHA, patient advocacy groups, and the University Interscholastic League (UIL), to overcome these obstacles